Zaire Clarke vs Jaeda Daniel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In evaluating the upcoming tennis match, the recent form of both players offers important insights. Daniel has shown stronger performance in securing points from their second serve, having succeeded in 38.48% of these opportunities over the past six months, compared to Clarke's 33.33%. When scrutinizing return game statistics, Daniel has a slight edge, winning 46.74% of opponents' second serve points, against Clarke's 41.67%. On first serve returns, Daniel continues to outperform Clarke with success rates of 36.22% compared to 33.85%.

The analysis under pressure reveals differing capabilities; Daniel saves 44.32% of breakpoints, while Clarke has been more effective, maintaining a save rate of 56%. Over the past year, Daniel recorded a match win rate of 43.48% (W/L 20/26), whereas Clarke has achieved a 50% win rate (W/L 2/2). The statistics imply a competitive head-to-head scenario, with both players having played a significant portion of their matches in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Daniel has secured a 45.45% win rate, slightly trailing Clarke's 50%.

When the surface is considered, Daniel's preferred surface is Hard, where their win rate is 53% (W/L 71/62), while on Indoor Hard, it drops to 42% (W/L 5/7). Clarke excels on Clay with a 67% win rate (W/L 2/1), but struggles on Hard courts with a 0% success rate (W/L 0/1). Regarding opponent caliber, Daniel has faced tougher competitors, with an average opponent rank of 138.85 over the last 12 months, significantly higher than Clarke's average opponent rank of 347.75.

Predicting outcomes in deciding sets reveals Daniel's lower performance, with a 27% win rate over the last year, as opposed to Clarke who has not secured any victories in such scenarios. These performance metrics are complemented by Daniel's recent breakpoint conversion rate of 38.71%, contrasting with Clarke's higher rate of 55.56%. This is a crucial factor for in-game predictions when breakpoint opportunities arise. Based on these statistics, Daniel appears to have a slight upper hand going into the match, provided they can leverage their strengths while addressing areas of vulnerability.